I
consider
myself as concerned as the next person about what has just
happened In Boston,
but not enough to spend the day watching TV to hear what is yet
to be known,
like who did it. The known details of the event are interesting,
but only to a
point. With my set muted here are two captions that attracted my
attention.
One
was that
terrorism was believed to be involved. No kidding! Does anyone
think that this
could have been a childish prank? Of course the word “terrorism”
is expected to
conjure up visions of Osama Bin Laden types. In what way were
Timothy McVeigh
and Oklahoma City different?
The
other caption
led to an unrelated strictly personal thought related to an
event half a
century ago, that read the FBI was going to head the
investigation. Fair enough!
But my immediate thought was that it didn’t do a crackerjack job
in JFK’s assassination.
Could J. Edgar Hoover, who remained FBI head until his death ten
years later, have
been complicit in the event? This is a question for
consideration that may not
be new to everyone as it was to me, not an answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment